How To Make Content Experiences Truly Social And Personalized
Jorge Espinel / October 28, 2010
Social networks have established a new “social paradigm” on how users can consume information on the Web. Content consumption in social networks has been mainly organized around friends or people you know. The primary tools provided by “social” experiences have proven to be highly addictive and engaging:
- People or entity-specific data feeds provide an easy way to personalize the data a user wants to receive (e.g., colleagues from my prior company, high school friends, celebrities, music bands)
- The “news feed” or “stream” is an efficient user interface which allows users to quickly snack on aggregated information
- The recommendation engine which enables user to add people to their network (e.g., people you may know, celebrities your friends like, etc.)
- In-stream interaction tools (comments, likes, pulse, check-ins) foster increased user engagement due to their low-friction
“Social” experiences tend to be much more personalized and allow users to consume information much more efficiently. Given its efficiency and precision, the “social paradigm” is likely to emerge as a dominant framework to create next-generation Web experiences. (These new Web experiences will apply the “social paradigm” to new data sets which today are organized using the traditional Website paradigm.)
It is important to make the following clarification: “social” is not limited to “people I am friends with or people I know.” While “social” products are commonly associated with social networks built around people’s relationships, the “social paradigm” can apply to services built around experts, interests, services, shopping, etc.
We are beginning to see examples of these new experiences. Quora, the recently launched Q&A service, applies the “social paradigm” to enhance the Q&A experience. Linked In has done the same for career and work related services. Microsoft and Facebook recently announced a series of products which seek to rethink the search experience using the “social paradigm”. Content experiences are poised to be the next area ripe for social innovation.
Applying the “social paradigm” to content experiences require adopting a different set of design principles from what is traditionally used by content websites. The following are some of the key design elements:
1) Profile managed by people or entities providing the data become the main environments where “deep engagement” and “consumption” takes place. This is where the user can access all the aggregated content related to a specific person of entity, and becomes the “showcase” destination.
2) Connecting or following people/entities becomes for content personalization
3) Content is organized around taxonomies that are built around people or entities (e.g., teams, brands, players, companies, etc.). Users can then group these entities into “personalized” playlists. Thus, each user gets to see only the relevant information they have selected to follow. This is in contrast with pre-established categories defined by an editor (sports, gossip, movies, celebrities, etc).
4) Each user is presented with a unique, personalized “feed or stream” of aggregated content rather than a “common” home page for everyone.
5) Recommendations are based on degrees of relationship or interest similarities between people and or entities rather than using semantics or collaborative filtering to determine relatedness.
6) Interaction tools are optimized to foster additional distribution of the content across the network (e.g., check-in, like, pulse) as well as increased user engagement in the site
When these “social” design concepts are applied to content experiences, the results can be transformative. More personalized offerings, better discovery solution, increased community activity and greater engagement.
Achieving mass personalization of content has been elusive to media companies for many years. Applying the “social paradigm” to content experiences offers the best chance to make it a reality in the near future.
Filed in: Advertisers,Content,Management,Web Advertising.









excellent observations but, and i am sorry, you are definitely on the wrong track
November 4, 2010 @ 5:55 pm
[...] From his personal blog, SpectatorBytes, News Corp corp dev EVP Jorge Espinel identifies what he sees as the key elements in effective web content today given the influence of social media. One such element: “Content is organized around taxonomies that are built around people or entities (e.g., teams, brands, players, companies, etc.). Users can then group these entities into ;personalized’ playlists. Thus, each user gets to see only the relevant information they have selected to follow. This is in contrast with pre-established categories defined by an editor (sports, gossip, movies, celebrities, etc).” Read more about what he calls “mass personalization.” [...]
November 8, 2010 @ 12:30 am
unlike Andrea, I think you are on the right track. This is the way a lot of people will digest their online content and advertising in the future. It is beginning to happen right now … look at social media platforms like Flipboard and dynamic creative ad platforms like Tumri, Teracent and Dapper.
but, like Andrea, I don’t believe ALL content will be consumed this way.
For example, I believe there is still a LOT of desire/demand for good old fashioned branded journalism – the Wall Street Journal, Vogue, Motor Trend, and Conde Nast Traveler still mean “authoritative” to most people, even if their content can be shared and consumed in a more atomic, personalized manner using semantic, social graph and taxonomic methods.
The trick to giving society the best of both worlds – without losing the best of our media brands and journalists in the process – is to deploy personalized advertising technologies that can better monetize personalized media, at the point of consumption (which is everywhere nowadays). I think this is the only direction we move from here – b/c I don’t believe people are gonna pay every publisher a fee to read their articles moving forward. Advertising is *still* the future of media. It’s just gonna look a bit different.
November 8, 2010 @ 10:57 am
Vernon – Thanks for the comment and I agree with your qualification. There will exist multiple behaviors and brands will ideally serve those multiple behaviors to stay relevant.
November 18, 2010 @ 7:36 pm
andrea – appreciate the comment nonetheless and it would be great if you could share your view of the world.
November 18, 2010 @ 7:37 pm
Balance… takes place over time.
Like most new innovations an extreme, all one way or nothing, functionality becomes criticized. I personally believe this is the only way to enter a market for two (out of hundreds) of reasons.
Scope creep during the alpha or beta stages of a product or service development could prove disastrous. I have seen it happen so many times when the darn thing never even gets to market as it is trying to do too much for too many people — alas it does nothing for nobody.
And, if there were too many bells, whistles, functions — or even a balance — innovators and early adopters couldn’t/wouldn’t get their head around it, try it and see if they like it.
Once the mass of Mikeys like it, a balance of features: some new and some old, some mass appeal and some special interest, some local and some global will naturally and happily infiltrate the functionality list.
Patience my dear friends. However, spout your desires — people are listening for version 2.0 – 10.0.
December 2, 2010 @ 1:21 pm