<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Web For Dummies Comes of Age</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spectatorbytes.com/2010/04/01/the-web-for-dummies-comes-of-age/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spectatorbytes.com/2010/04/01/the-web-for-dummies-comes-of-age/</link>
	<description>Commenting on the Evolution of the Digital Media Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 14:27:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://spectatorbytes.com/2010/04/01/the-web-for-dummies-comes-of-age/comment-page-1/#comment-4700</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 22:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spectatorbytes.com/?p=909#comment-4700</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s also something that the big boys will need to be cautious of in that the simplification of consumption is also being paired with the simplification of contribution.  As it&#039;s already happening with sites like facebook, fark, Kickapps, etc...  the communities are able to bring their own &quot;new&quot; content which by itself, can be as compelling to the end user as the more expensive content. 

Consumption&#039;s greatest ally is always about convenience regardless of brand.  Brand can help, but it&#039;s not a critical or necessary component in the long run. I imagine that&#039;s why you see migration from one large brand to the next  - even if it&#039;s much smaller - ala  friendster to myspace to facebook to twitter (back to facebook with the twitter-like update).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s also something that the big boys will need to be cautious of in that the simplification of consumption is also being paired with the simplification of contribution.  As it&#8217;s already happening with sites like facebook, fark, Kickapps, etc&#8230;  the communities are able to bring their own &#8220;new&#8221; content which by itself, can be as compelling to the end user as the more expensive content. </p>
<p>Consumption&#8217;s greatest ally is always about convenience regardless of brand.  Brand can help, but it&#8217;s not a critical or necessary component in the long run. I imagine that&#8217;s why you see migration from one large brand to the next  &#8211; even if it&#8217;s much smaller &#8211; ala  friendster to myspace to facebook to twitter (back to facebook with the twitter-like update).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

